We Share Our Mother’s Health – The Knife


New video from The Knife, directed by Motomichi Nakamura

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to We Share Our Mother’s Health – The Knife

  1. SerathDarklands says:

    … What?

  2. MrsDreadness says:

    Lady Gaga is some shitty pop singer. I do not know why you are talking about her, HERE, in true different art like THE KNIFE.

  3. Mustela13 says:

    <3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3

  4. 45psi says:

    stars that burn brightly, burn quickly

  5. savadiltok says:

    Check out my ringtone of this video 0:18 – 0:39 at tube2tone{.)com

  6. FrankHammond1906 says:

    Lady Gaga is pure style over substance,she tries to be very ‘quirky’ and ‘out there’ but it is all a show, it’s all just throught up by A and R people to fill a niche. The knife are Brilliant!

  7. stevenofbodom says:

    this song and video are.. paranoic, absurd, obsessive.. AWESOME..!

  8. LocustaVampa says:

    Meh. She’s ok I’m just not really interested in that kind of performer. She doesn’t offer anything new and what she does offer is substandard imho.

    .I like that she exists tho. She’s a good celeb.

  9. TykoEaston says:

    @LocustaVampa

    Gaga’s whole concept is being a pop tart – the *point* is that she borrows ideas, tries to distill the purest extract of all aspects of “pop music” as we undersand it today, which is more broad than ever

    We need both in this world.

  10. d4nc4n0s0 says:

    Ok now seriusly, i respect that you like Gaga, but you can’t say that’s art and if you say that’s art probably is barroque but popart, no way

  11. LocustaVampa says:

    Gaga is a pop tart. The Knife are infinitely more creative. Gaga is great or what she is but she is a borrower of ideas.

  12. LocustaVampa says:

    lol my opinion is so different from yours!

  13. d4nc4n0s0 says:

    what da f*#k. someone tell this retarded who was warhol and what popart means. do you have 23 chromoses or something?, gaga is freak-pop or shit-pop, who cares

  14. Agustinwonder says:

    Okay Gaga and the knife should never be compared. I love both artist. Gaga is art but she is more POP ART, Pop art plays off pop culture that why it appeals to the masses. Where as The Knife is more cultural influence they with this more kind of tribal feel. Which is not as commercial.

  15. lucydingdong says:

    I adore this song, but that still doesn’t stop me from being more than a little scared of this video.

  16. cacarotote2 says:

    aahhh

  17. supersayn53 says:

    @immyfan25 oh you fulla sht betty crocka mtha fka, come on …and what about the 2 dogs and that mask lil bit when that guy screws her face? fuk ye thats all poker face music homie, laters bro.

  18. supersayn53 says:

    @billihaneyxp ooohh ohhh me MEEE! right here.

  19. zoidberg590 says:

    This tune is so creative its amazing. I dont even know where to start describing it

  20. ConferenceOfMutes says:

    @immyfan25
    You are a pretentious fuck who lacks any idea of what they’re talking about.
    Lady GaGa PURPOSLEY appeals to the public, because it makes money. She is very smart, cares nothing about the fans or the art. She dresses like she does and makes poppy music because it makes money, not for the fans.

  21. YoanaOvcharova says:

    a video has neever tripped me out before..but this def got me haha:)

  22. sadysadycool says:

    because the word seem
    i am not sweedish or something so i’d want to apologise for the confusion
    anyway other 3 people warned me about the nationality of these guys., so you could sthu… ;)

    anyway, the director of the clip was japanese :P

  23. sexyjunanny says:

    hmzsexi girl looking for a sexi guy Or girl hihi

  24. djphreaxshow says:

    dont ever be foolish enough to think that any artists isnt thinking of money when they create.

  25. immyfan25 says:

    You don’t know what you’re talking about. Gaga doesn’t try to pull from these types of visuals but rather from 70s commercial art and musical artists like Grace Jones. Comparing her to Disney also implies a corporate approach to creativity that puts art in the back seat but she never considers finiancial gain when creating and is only thinking of her art and her fans. I’m not saying that these artists’ aesthetics are the same but what you’re saying about GaGa couldn’t be further from the truth